26694768_174538926629925_326770078_nHey, there are plenty of folks out there who don’t like bottoming and even some who don’t like to top. Why? Because gay sex is only legible to straight people in terms of the heterosexual matrix, and if someone’s son is fucking a dude/is a top, well then that’s way preferable than if he was getting plowed by D’s all day long.

This attitude is wholly cultural and deeply rooted in how we think about gender. Like, men are supposed to be men. Like, men don’t take dicks up the ass.

I was talking to a bunch of my gay male friends recently about bottom shaming and one of them pointed out that he always attracts bi or “curious” straight tops because 1) they already know he’s gay and 2) they already assume he’s a bottom because he is slightly effeminate.

The problem with bottom-shaming is when gay sex taps into misogynistic shit around male dominance.

Bottoms are often seen as less than men by society and even by gay men.

There’s more: anyone who has had gay male sex knows that it includes a whole economy of degradation, where bottoms are often called “bitch” or “cocksucker” or “sissy” or “faggot” in the bedroom. There is countless pornography where “sissies” and “faggots” service “real men.” And hey, some people like being called names in the bedroom, but that doesn’t take away from the issue any.

The whole bottom/top debate moves beyond physical traits, things we are born into, and towards flash decisions made based on appearance and gender performance. A hot bottom might X out a Grindr profile of a guy he thinks isn’t “toppy” enough for his needs, and a smoking top might only like “masc” and “straight acting” bottoms. In all cases, effeminacy or feminine traits are a no no, faggotry and sissydom are bad, and all the cultural power belongs to the top.

I’m not sure how much gender performance plays a role when I think about the types of guys I’m attracted to. Sure, I have a preference for tall-ass skinny hipster-y guys who look like they maybe did some coke this morning before they worked on an art project lol, but there are tons of bros my height who could get it. The point is that gay men often read clues like fashion, gender performance and height or body size to try to figure out if a guy is a top, a bottom, or if he’s maybe versatile.

At the end of the day, this whole debate is about protecting manliness. But why does it even matter to be seen as a “man” in the first place? And to whom does it matter? Can’t you just be a body that enjoys having stuff done to it by other people, without the bullshit misogynist industrial complex swooping in? Can’t we just have sex?


3 Comments Add yours

  1. renudepride says:

    Right on time, my blogging buddy! This stereotypical garbage belongs in a time when all gay and bisexual men were treated as though they had no value! Awesome job! I salute you! Naked hugs!


  2. D. C. says:

    As long as hip-hop remains the dominant black cultural influence, nothing will change. I saw this happening YEARS ago, when hip-hop destroyed house music as a genre. One after another, clubs began to close or change their programming, because all of a sudden house music was too “faggoty”, especially when the room became dominated by voguing sissies. Everyone wanted to stand around being pseudo thuggish and appearing “masculine”, even the painted eyebrow, makeup wearing kweens with ballcaps on. But now there is a whole “proud bottom” culture that wants to complain that there aren’t enough tops. I HATE sexual position labeling as a guide to finding a suitable partner. Perhaps if people weren’t so anxious to label themselves, or feel it necessary to align themselves with one or the other (to the point of not being able to even negotiate on the subject) I’d feel differently.


    1. D. C. says:

      I also meant to say, that bottom shaming might not occur so much if “proud bottoms” weren’t so often over the top with stereotypical behavior. It’s one thing to be a more feminine gay man, and another to be a loud, flamboyant, contrived sissy, a la the picture attached to this article.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s